STATUS: I'll be out of the office all next week for the RT Convention in Chicago. Wait, wasn't I just out of town?
What’s playing on the XM or iPod right now? PYRO by Kings of Leon
More and more as of late, I find myself creating what I call an editorial road map for any novel.
Now, when I edit a client manuscript, I use track changes to make comments as I read along. That's pretty standard
But lately, after I finish the entire read, I then go back through the novel to construct the road map. In this process, I literally skim through the work, chapter by chapter, and I create an outline of all the major plot points by chapter for the novel.
I find that the process of formulating the outline allows me to create a framework for writing up my editorial letter.
Via the outline, I can clearly point out what works, what doesn't work, where it should build tension or escalate the stakes, what could be deleted to tightened or even if the story has gone off the rails completely.
It's definitely more work on my part but I think it a valuable exercise. In fact, my "road map" critiques are becoming a bit legendary with my clients. *grin* They love it (or maybe they are too afraid to say otherwise!)
And to be blunt, from a lot of the sample pages and full manuscripts I've read within the last 6 months, I think many writers could benefit from doing a critique road map of their own. It really does force you to ignore character, dialogue, description and boil the story down to its plot skeleton core.
A lot can be revealed about pacing and story arc.
Hum…. I'm sensing there may be a workshop idea here.